Well, I reached your first article in the series (and this one) directly from my Medium recommendations. I'll read your related articles to see if I missed another gold nugget.
I try to read almost everything that talks about spacetime, entanglement Relativity and Quantum Mechanics since I developed my own understanding about how the universe works.
I understood that any phenomenon at the speed of light always implies some kind of entanglement between emitter and absorber, and found that these insights could help solving all quantum problems in a simple way.
I try to get away from spiritual or metaphysical interpretations, because what I intended was precisely to get a clear understanding of things, and I think I finally got to something simple that can explain a lot. I think that adding more concepts, entities and mechanisms to how reality might work just beause your math, theory or religion requires them is just an incorrect approach.
I also discovered the Transactional Interpretation and Kastner's book years after I developed these ideas on my own (she was writing her book while I was thinking about the weird behavior of light). The Transactional Interpretation match perfectly with my ideas because the premise is that there are no real emissions without real detections, that interactions are indivisible happenings that manifest in spacetime all at once.
I also agree with Rovelli's Relational Interpretation because now I understand that all fundamental interactions take place at the speed of light. They are the energy and information exchanges that compose our reality, so the speed of light is the fundamental "speed" at which reality updates itself for those material entities able to observe it. Any other property, phenomenon or entity is a pattern or composition made of interactions. That's why the speed of light is independent of the source: photons are not "impulsed" or "launched" by the source, the light source internal structure and its apparent motion with respect to all other elements of reality is the result of the countless light-like interactions that sustain its existence each time. Light-like interactions shape any phenomenon under the hood.
So it is not that I like what Rovelli or Kastner state for no reason, it is because my own findings took me there.
